How To Wire Dual Voice Coil Alpine Type R

The Fujimori: a (bad) form of government again

By: Santiago Pedraglio

When Keiko Fujimori's government says his father has been the best of Peru makes clear his vision of how to send in the country. The Fujimori speaks of its founder, the father of the candidate, El Salvador and Peru. The idea of \u200b\u200bhow to conquer the targets are not linked to respect and strengthen democratic institutions or simply state, and individual rights, but the pragmatism to win results.

The Fujimori presented, for example, the capture of Guzman and the defeat of Sendero as a result of the 1992 coup, ie the most undemocratic and anti-institutional act would be allowed, according to this reading, to win success. Thereby ignoring the actions of the villagers, the local and regional authorities, political parties and democratic movements, and even the intelligence work of the police and armed forces. So currently justify the decision to end the rule of law. Fujimori's pragmatism goes against the construction of institutional democratic tradition.

The Fujimori is also synonymous with patronage, ie the establishment of a policy of handouts that does not solve the underlying problems or build citizens with full rights. If at the beginning of the 1990 privatization of resources were a source of corruption and cronyism, now accumulated resources as a result of ten years of economic growth is the bag that you can dip into this populism "spoiled." The Fujimori government program is a clear expression of this purpose. When the first point calls for "shared growth to reduce poverty," the five areas are not intended to affect the redistribution of income between private and state, for example through tax reform, but are simply welfare programs .

The Fujimori therefore expresses a political culture that has at its center on pragmatism, political patronage and the capture of key institutions of the state as the armed forces and the judiciary. This is because the pragmatic will prevail on the institutions, not in its governance practices respect the separation of powers nor the acceptance of an independent press or the existence of a democratic political opposition.

The risk of corruption, with a possible triumph of Force 2011, is a consequence of this style of government, particularly because, having money in the state and complacent political blocs, which also lost their leadership (Pedro Pablo Kuczynski and Luis Castillo), the table will be provided.